TEACHER LEARNING PORTAL
  • Home
  • Digital Tools
  • Home
  • Digital Tools

Activity 5 - Professional Connection Map

2/26/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
I have identified the following two professional connections that I have in my map that have had a significant impact on my practice:
  1. My Principal
  2. The Mindlab

My Principal
My principal and I started at Glenfield Primary School at roughly the same time. I was just embarking on my new role as teacher and she had just taken over her new role from the acting principal having come from a South Auckland school.

Without a doubt my principal was and continues to be the most influential connection I have in my own practice and within my professional community. Her impact has been enormous on me as an individual and as a teacher.
She has been driven to make each and every one of us teachers the best that we can be so that we can teach the students in the most effective way possible. With an open door policy, her support, guidance and trust in me, my abilities and my learning has allowed me to flourish as a teacher.

I feel that we have a common interest in keeping abreast of the latest global trends in teaching. We talk freely about these trends, she motivates and inspires me to try new things and not to be afraid to fail, as long as I learn. She provides me and my community with current and engaging professional development, she listens, she provokes and she supports me as I am learning how to be an effective 21st century educator.

She has been excited by what I have learnt with the Mindlab, helping me with assignments, reading my work and making comments and suggestions on how I can improve what I am doing, always giving me pertinent feedback.  As ICT leader she trusts implicitly in the decisions I make, the technology we purchase, the support partners I choose and the digital pedagogies that I utilise within the classroom.  This support has helped me become a more confident and effective ICT leader.

My principal leads by example and it is her qualities, work ethic and determination to do what is right that will leave a lasting impact on me throughout my teaching career.

The Mindlab

It would have been an obvious choice to reference my students as having the greatest impact on my professional practice but it is the Mindlab that has also had a huge impact on my practice in a relatively short period of time.
The exposure that I have had to such engaging, motivating and inspiring tutors (and fellow teachers), coupled with the hands on learning, interaction with others on the course, videos, course readings, assignments, provocations and discussions has been profound.

I have learnt so much from my tutors and peers, made many new connections and have been exposed to so many thoughts and technologies and I feel so motivated and inspired to be a teacher in these fast and exciting times.
My practice has changed as result of this course; with the two areas of leadership and student-centred learning having had the most impact on me. It is interesting that it is not the digital element of the course that I mentioning here!

The learnings from this course and the new teaching methods that I have applied is slowly changing my teaching program and the way that I teach, interact with the students and interact with my community. Not only this but my peers have seen what is going on in my classroom and are inquiring themselves into their practice and partnerships with their students.

I have also reflected on areas that I might not necessarily would have done, read and criticised literature that I might not have done and asked questions about my own and others practice that I may not have done. Plus of course, I have been exposed to a wealth of applications and websites that are gradually making my way into the classroom and across the school much to the students, teachers and parents excitement.

0 Comments

Activity 4: Your Professional Community

2/23/2016

0 Comments

 
A community of practice is a group of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do, and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. Communities of practice are formed by people who engage in a process of collective learning in a shared domain of human endeavor. (Wenger & Trayner-Wenger, 2015)

When defining my community of practice in regard to Wenger’s concept of community of practice it is important to note that this has been clarified further by his summarising of community of practice as being ‘groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly’.

Working in the education system I feel that my community of practice is ‘ a complex social system that can be viewed as constituted by interrelated communities of practice’ (Wenger & Trayner-Wenger, 2015) and is far reaching. However, the core of my community, the heart of my practice, as you will, should be defined by recognising my immediate stakeholders; these being my students, my students parents, my fellow teachers and principal (within my school), the Board of Trustees and my ICT support partners and vendors.  All three of these groups I identify as constituting my domain, one of three characteristics defined by Wagner to describe a shared interest - that of learning.

Wenger goes on to further define two further characteristics of a community of practice, that of community and practice. The former (community), which would refer to my stakeholders engaging in joint activities and discussions, sharing information and helping each other. The latter (practice), whereby my stakeholders ‘develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems—in short, a shared practice’. This can be broken down in the following way:

Students: If I am a committed and reflective educator then my students and I will create positive student-teacher learning partnerships.

Teachers: My fellow teachers and I will be in constant pursuit of upskilling ourselves through the wider community (see below), and from each other to enable us to become more effective educators and collaborators.

Parents: My parents will wish to learn about their students, their progress and how they can be supported at home and within school. They should also be actively involved with school life.

Board of Trustees: The board of trustees is responsible for setting the overall policies of the school, the budget and ensuring that the overall needs of the community (the students, teachers and parents) are met.

ICT Partners: Being the ICT Leader I am constantly liaising with my third support and ICT vendors to ensure that the school network together with the hardware and software is up to date and running effectively.

Within my wider educational sphere of practice I would identify the main bodies of my community to be the cluster schools in my area, specialist education centres such as Team Solutions and the Mind Lab and then the virtual global community - Social Networking sites, Pond, Google + and the many other professional development websites and resource sites.

What Is My Specialist Area of Practice?

My school-wide responsibility is that of ICT Leader. Below are a few of the responsibilities that I am accountable for:
  • Ensuring network infrastructure is current, robust and efficient
  • 1st Line Support for all ICT related queries or hardware/software problems
  • ICT budget
  • ICT Strategic Plan
  • Keeping appraised of new technologies, applications and websites
  • School-Wide Professional Development
  • Building and Maintaining partnerships with third party ICT support and vendors

My specialist area of practice relates very closely to the current shift in practice in relation to the broader professional context. In ‘Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching - a New Zealand perspective’ (Bolstad et al., 2012)  the following points are of note:

  • New kinds of partnerships and relationships with the community are possible as learners work with real challenges in a range of real world contexts
  • Cultural and linguistic diversity are strengths to be nurtured so that all learners can engage confidently in a global environment
  • A future-oriented learning system requires that all those involved in education are involved in continuous learning

My specialist area is vital as we learn how to incorporate existing and emerging digital technologies into the classroom as a way of creating new learning opportunities and ways of learning and as we connect locally and globally with an array of communities (defined above), both within my immediate domain and on a global scale.
This is easier said than done however, as we look to address the current issues within the community and the challenges that I face in my own practice.

What Are The Current Issues In Your Community?

It is beyond the scope of this post to reflect upon all of the community issues that we currently face but I have identified that of ‘communicating effectively with parents so that they become more aware of their child’s learning and more aware of school life and activities’ as one of the most important, and an area that I/we feel that can be improved upon.

One, of the ways the we are looking to address this is through the use of ICT. We are looking at the ways that technology can be used to communicate more effectively with parents. Specifically:
  • Our school SMS system
  • Email communication
  • Blogging
  • Applications such as ClassDojo
  • Apps contained with the Google Apps suite
  • Social Media - Twitter, Facebook

We are also now looking at developing e-portfolios that can be accessed online by the parents so that they are more aware of their child’s learning. We are addressing these issues currently amongst the staff, not our parents, which, as I am writing this, feels like something we should be doing and I will bring it to my principal's attention.

As a staff we are each trying different things. Some of us are trialling Class Dojo, some are blogging, some are using Google Docs and Classroom, some are not using anything, which needs to be addressed. We will meet back shortly to discuss what is working, not working and the challenges we are currently facing. We are also going to meet with the BOT to discuss the use Facebook as a tool to communicate more effectively with our community as we feel that the type of demographic that our school resides in would be susceptible to this form of communication.

What Are The Challenges That You Face In Your Practice?

The greatest challenges that I face within my specialist area of IT is: (in no particular order):
  • Keeping on top of all the emerging technologies, applications and websites that could be utilised within the school together with which ones are effective and which are not.
  • Are we using the existing technologies we have effectively? Do we have effective digital pedagogies in place?
  • Are the teachers comfortable with the technology that they have at their disposal and are they using it effectively?
  • Consistency in the use of ICT across the school
  • Providing effective PD across the school
  • Not providing too much PD too soon
  • Cyber Safety/Digital Citizenship programs to students, teachers and parents

We are addressing all of these issues on some level at this stage and it is important to clarify that since carrying out the leadership module from the Mind Lab that I feel that I am doing this more effectively than I was before.
I have created an ICT team that covers all year levels and teacher expertise and we meet to discuss current issues and concerns that are detailed above. We have created a digital citizenship and cyber safety program, we have had a student/teacher/parent community evening where we have presented and discussed the inherent dangers of being online. We have started talking to the board about the possibility of using social media as a better method of communication. We have conducted staff surveys through Google Forms on teachers perception of ICT and how it is used within the school. We are soon to start a coffee club where teachers can come and discuss the latest websites and applications (both locally and globally), that are available and how they are using them within the classroom.
​

As mentioned above, this post has only highlighted what I feel are the most important issues and challenges that I and my community face in my specialised area of practice and these can only be achieved through effective leadership and collaborative efforts within my immediate local domain and in the wider global community.

References


Wenger, E., & Trayner-Wenger, B. (2015). Communities of practice: a brief introduction. April 2015, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.2277/0521663636

Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching - A New Zealand perspective\n. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf
​

0 Comments

Responses to Finlay’s (2008) Article

2/17/2016

1 Comment

 
Before reading Reflecting on ‘Reflective Practice’ (Finlay 2008) my definition of reflective practice mirrored that of (Boud et al 1985; Boyd and Fales, 1983; Mezirow, 1981, Jarvis, 1992) being that ‘reflective practice is understood as the process of learning through and from experience towards gaining new insights of self and/or practice’. I could not have worded the definition as succinctly as this but this has been my understanding. However, after reading the article I was both interested and surprised at the depth of analysis that reflective practice involves and what it’s connotations (both positive and negative) can have on myself, my peers and my Year 4/6 students.

Below I have highlighted some of the points that within the article that I can relate to in my my reflective practice.
  1. McKay (2008, Forthcoming) states that reflecting on performance and acting on reflection is a ‘professional imperative’. I would very much agree with this. As an individual I am constantly reflecting on my role as a teacher and in fact anything that I undertake both professionally and personally both on a conscious and subconscious level. Surely this is a given if we strive to improve on any areas of life? What I have learnt as a teacher is that I must always be very conscious of this in the classroom so that I am able to ascertain what is working for a student and what is not. Of equal importance is that I am constantly obtaining student voice to ensure that my observations are backed up by the students thoughts on how I teach and what I teach.
  2. Schon (1983, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action) whose paper discusses how we facilitate reflective practitioners, identifies reflection-in-action which is ‘thinking while doing’. Here he talks about how professionals that become more expert in their practice develop the skill of monitoring and adapting their practice simultaneously. This I can also relate to. When I started out as a teacher I had an overwhelming number of challenges to deal with which did not allow me the time to adopt this skill. However, as my skills as a teacher have increased and as I have become more knowledgeable in my profession I now have the capability and skills to do this. I am more skillful at judging what is working/not working, how I am talking to a student(s), what I am asking them to do and I am able to better modify my practice on the fly to hopefully provide a better learning experience for the student(s). However, I am still learning here, and will always continue to do so.
  3. The model of reflection that I have traditionally used is the ‘Cycle of Inquiry’ (Zealand, 2007) found in the New Zealand Curriculum but in all honesty reflection is something I have always done on a metacognitive level with no structure sitting behind it and I freely admit to not having used the Cycle of Inquiry model in the way that I probably should have. This I feel was due to its somewhat basic, obvious nature. However, I am now in the process of learning a new model for reflection called ‘The Spiral of Inquiry’ and which is discussed later in this blog. Having researched this reflection model to some depth, and with my new understandings on reflection it has caused me to think about my expectations of my students ability to reflect on their learning. Because I have never seriously entertained the use of a structured reflective model in my practice then I have not expected my children to. I have been constantly frustrated by their inability to reflect on more than a superficial level. Boud and Walker (1998) brought clarity to me here by stating that reflection can be turned into a rote exercise as  ‘checklists which students work through in a mechanical fashion without regard to their own uncertainties, questions and meanings’. This is absolutely correct and something that I will be attempting to amend this year. We all know that students need modelling for clarity and so how can I expect them to produce meaningful reflections without the use of one to follow?

The Reflective Model that I am Adopting - The Spiral of Inquiry
​

Picture
The model that I am adopting is being adopted through our whole school. The model is ‘The Spiral of Inquiry’ and has been chosen through collaboration amongst the teachers. I find it a suitable model to use for the following reasons.
  1. It is based on the ‘Cycle of Inquiry’ (Zealand, 2007) but is further reaching by encompassing learners, their families and communities.
  2. It is a relatively straightforward and easy model to follow as the authors walk the learner through the process using illustrated examples and boxes to help with PLD.
  3. The model is broken down into six distinct stages with the learner being a central figure. Each of these six stages is explicitly explained so that the process of reflection is more structured and consistent across the school. Please note school (not wider community in this instance). Please note here that as a learner I need this structured reflective model just as my students do. See above.
  4. The spiral of inquiry takes a different approach. It asks you to adopt a curiosity mindset to identify what is going on for learners and to develop some hunches about what is leading to the current situation, before deciding what to do about it. In this way you can work out what is working well so you can build on it, and what is not working so well so you can make changes. (Timperley, H., Kaser, L., and Halbert, 2014)
  5. It is based on evidence informed collaborative inquiry which allows me to collaborate more effectively with my peers and community in an informed way.
  6. Each stage is interconnected to the other. They are not isolated stages meaning that the reflection is a cycle has no start and stop point. It flows.
  7. It has two basic and powerful questions at its heart. 1. What is going on for our learners? 2. How de we know?

I feel that I have only scraped the surface of the suitability of this reflective model to my practice and must emphasize that I have not yet actually used it either. However, I am looking forward to a more structured way of reflecting on my practice personally, school-wide and eventually through the wider community. I also hope that we can use/tailor this model to help scaffold the students to produce more insightful and reflective work when we ask it of them instead of the superficial accounts that I am currently receiving.

References

Finlay, B. L. (2008). Reflecting on “ Reflective practice .” PBPL Paper 52, (January), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/0260-4779(91)90031-R

Boud, D. and Fales, A. (1983) Reflective learning: Key to Learning from Experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99-117.

McKay, E.A. (2008, Forthcoming) Reflective practice: doing, being and becoming a reflective practitioner. Skills for Practice in Occupational Therapy. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

Schon, D.A (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books

Zealand, T. N. (2006). The New Zealand Curriculum. Methods, 116(1185), 44. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/the_new_zealand_curriculum 37.
​

Timperley, H., Kaser, L., and Halbert, J. (2014). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry. Centre for Strategic Education, (April).
1 Comment

Metacognitive reflection on learning and practice

2/14/2016

0 Comments

 
This post is a reflection on the last 24 weeks of my postgraduate studies which comprises of a critical discussion of:
  • two of the key competencies that have developed the most
  • two key changes in my own practice

Key Competencies

My understanding and importance of the key competencies over the duration of this course have developed exponentially. From being something that I had vague knowledge about, I have now realised their critical importance to both myself as a learner and to that of my students in their day to day learning in the classroom.
Without doubt, the two key competencies I have developed the most during this period are Managing Self and Thinking.

Managing Self

This competency is associated with self-motivation, a “can-do” attitude, and with students seeing themselves as capable learners. It is integral to self-assessment. (Ministry of Education, 1997)

I would first like to highlight the fact that all definitions of the key competencies on the aforementioned site relate to the ‘students’, and it is important here that I differentiate myself as the student in this post, not the students that I teach, although the impact of my new knowledge of the competencies is impacting on the wider community of both my students and fellow teachers within Glenfield Primary School.

In order to simultaneously attend this course, carry out a full time job and make significant positive ICT changes within the school over the last 6 months has come down to my resilient, self-motivating can do attitude. I am learner. I learn from my peers and I learn from my students and I have involved them in this course, modelling this competency as clearly and competently as I can.
​

With the aid of my peers I have helped to develop a program whereby my students have a more personalised learning program hinged on their ability to determine what learning areas need strengthening and then being self motivated to act upon them. This has involved the development of newly created reading, writing and maths progressions throughout the school and empowering the students to read, understand and refer to them regularly so that they can recognise what they need to be taught. This they do by requesting lessons from me through Gmail/Google Docs and by me sitting down with individual students to help them pinpoint what these areas are. This enables me (and them) to collect real time data on where they are at and then setting high standards to meet these goals. Together with my students, (and professional development discussions with my peers) we then look at and implement strategies to help accomplish these goals.

Thinking

Thinking is about using creative, critical, and metacognitive processes to make sense of information, experiences, and ideas. (Ministry of Education, 1997)

I have become rather more non-compliant resulting in a change to my way of thinking regarding what is ‘the norm’ when it comes to teaching. I am now more empowered to challenge the way we teach and I am no longer willingly to accept what has been standard practice as we move into the 21st Century. This has involved a process of deep reflection on my part, researching in more detail the way children learn, challenging why we use certain tests to determine the ‘intelligence’ of students and adapting my teaching in order to teach a diverse range of cultures, age levels and abilities to the best of my own ability. For example, we are no longer using E-Asttle writing tests to determine a child's ability to write on a subject they have no interest in and then comparing it to a set of exemplars they seem inconsistent at best. Now we are allowing the students to write about a topic that interests them and marking it together with the student, using our writing progressions.

We are no longer using E-Asttle to mark a reading test due to the ridiculous scores that are spat out which in no way reflect that child’s ability to comprehend, and what reading strategies they require, and thus not giving us the valuable information required to inform their next learning goals. Now we use our new reading progressions, again with the children.

The new ways of testing, the empowerment to ask challenging questions, the curiosious and inquiring mind that I have to allow me to try new things are all small examples of the way this competency has changed me as a teacher and learner and of course then modelling and imparting these skills onto my students so that they may also change their perception of what traditionally a student and teacher is and their relationship.

Two Key Changes to my practice

Student Voice

The use of student voice and its importance to inform my practice has been one of the key changes that I have developed over the course of this study. As with the competencies, I was aware of student voice and had used it in what I can only describe as being in a superficial way (if I am being particularly critical of myself), but now it has become a critical part of my everyday practice. I now instill into my students the importance of their voice to inform me of what I am doing well and what I need to work at. A somewhat resilient attitude needs to be adopted here, as children do not mince their words but it is important that I take on board what they say and then try to act on their thoughts and suggestions. This is done either orally or through digital technologies. For example, I have recently set up a Google Form called ‘Knowing Your Learner’ whereby the children fill in a series of questions that allow me to better understand their families, their background, their culture and their interests. Another example is where we have introduced a new basic facts test. At the end of the test we had a Q&A session on their experience. From this (and with subsequent talks with my peers) we will modify the test (using the same questions) but changing the order in which they were asked. This was due to many of the children panicking at the beginning of the test with these perceived harder questions, which then disrupted their momentum as they worked through the rest of it. It is important to note that these are just snapshots of the changes I have made to this change in my practice.

Leadership

I came into this course not really ever having perceived myself as a leader - within the eyes of my students or within the eyes of my peers. Sure, I was the ‘ICT leader’ and a teacher but to me, the leaders were ‘the leadership team’ and my principal. This perception has now changed, together with the complexities of what leadership actually means at both a personal and organizational level.

Through the course of the ‘Leadership in Digital and Collaborative Learning’ module I came to understand how our school is based on the ‘distributive’ model and how us as teachers are seen as vital components of the decision making process of the school and that this also extends to the ‘input of decision making being extended to the students and listening to their voice.’ (Harris, 2008).

As I further investigated and reflected upon this I was able to see that yes, I was a leader of both my peers and students and that I was (mainly) demonstrating the styles of distributive, autocratic and transformational leadership. I came to realise that all of these styles have a place in the school system and classroom but need to be used with much care and at the right time. I am still learning here and will always do so.

One example was where I was demonstrating the autocratic leadership style without realising it, and in a bad way. This was in my role as ICT leader whereby ‘I’ was making the majority of the decisions because ‘I’ knew best, and I was also demonstrating this in the classroom. A detailed account of the classroom example can be found in assignment LDC2 on this website (and which closely relates to student voice). Regarding my autocratic approach as the ICT Leader, I have now grown my ICT team to include a range of teachers who work with different year levels and who have varying degrees of ICT expertise. I now facilitate the discussions and issues that need to be addressed but as a team we make the decisions together before giving the rest of the staff their voice. This I feel has made the staff more empowered and involved in the ICT decision making progress - but I have yet to gain their voice on whether or not this is the case!

References
Ministry of Education. (2007). Key Competencies. Wellington, New Zealand
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership : developing tomorrow's leaders. London New York: Routledge.





0 Comments

Introduction

2/11/2016

0 Comments

 
My name is Scott Hillman and I am currently working at Glenfield Primary School as a Year 4/6 teacher. I am also the ICT leader of the school. The primary reason that I have commenced this blog is to fulfil part of the assessment requirement of a course I am currently undertaking but in reality it is the catalyst that I needed to motivate myself into blogging about my experiences and musings within the educational arena.

As you will have seen from the front page of my blog, the course that I am involved with is the 'Postgraduate Certificate in Applied Practice (Digital & Collaborative Learning)'. This website that I have created draws on my learnings from the course and attempts to pull together some of the readings, websites and videos that I have watched and referenced within my studies and used in the classroom, into one easy to reference site.

The primary reason that I signed up for this course is that I hoped that it would evolve my practice in the fields of digital technologies and pedagogies and that of leadership.

Having moved into teaching with a background in Information Technology (I graduated with a degree in computer science), and having worked for several multinational companies in the preceding ten years, I have always held a fascination with technology. This, I have naturally brought into the classroom and my style of teaching utilises a range of technologies, applications and websites which aims to deliver a comprehensive, dynamic, student-centred learning environment whereby the students are at the heart of the learning. Here, digital tools are used to enhance and support this learning in a way where I strive to give my students a more tailored and personalised program.
 
If I could summarise my teaching philosophy it would be in the following way:

I am an innovative and motivational educator and ICT leader in the primary sector using digital pedagogies to provide my students and teachers with the key competencies and skills to succeed as effective 21st century learners and teachers.
0 Comments

    Author

    21st Century Educator, UltraMarathon Runner, Motorbike Rider, Globe Trotter.

    Archives

    March 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.